AI Application Impact Assessment Template (Hong Kong)
Tags: Frameworks
TL;DR
- A structured, question-based assessment with risk gating, lifecycle-aligned questions, and stakeholder impact analysis.
- Must be reviewed at four key stages of the AI Lifecycle and updated regularly (e.g., annually) or upon major changes.
Why it matters for HK marketers: This is the paperwork your AI initiatives will be judged on—build it into your campaign plan from day one.
What it covers
- Risk Gating Criteria: Determines assessment depth based on application risk.
- Assessment Questions: Mapped to lifecycle stages with explanatory text.
- Practice Guide References: Links questions to concrete practices.
- Impact Considerations: Identifies beneficial/negative impacts to stakeholders and required controls.
When to run it
- Stage 1 Review (Project Strategy).
- Stage 2 Review (Project Ecosystem/Development).
- Stage 3 Impact Review (System Deployment, before rollout).
- Stage 4 Post-Release Review (System Operation & Monitoring).
- Also updated annually or with major changes.
Responsibilities and scope
- Project Team: Completes the assessment; answers specified question ranges by stage (e.g., 1–8; 9(i); 41–49; 57–58 at strategy; additional ranges at later stages, including 10–14, 18–19, 22–29, 30(i–iii), 31–37, 38–40, 50–56).
- PSC/PAT: Reviews and endorses; approves before delivery.
- IT Board/CIO: Reviews high‑risk cases; monitors during maintenance.
4 assessment review stages across the lifecycle.
Annual or change-triggered reassessment required.
So what for marketers
Integrate the assessment into creative and media timelines—assign owners for each question set and gather vendor/data evidence early to pass PSC/PAT review on schedule.
← Back to Knowledge Base